Miller’s most lasting influence, however, came not from his overall study of the Puritans but from his assertions about one particular text. And because he began America with the Puritans-because he did so in such an original way and with such overwhelming force-he left in his wake a long train of scholars who took up the study of early New England with fresh interest, all of them re-envisioning Puritanism for the twentieth century. In graduate school, as Miller once recalled, “it seemed obvious that I had to commence with the Puritan migration.” The short prologue of his most widely read book, Errand into the Wilderness (1956), uses the words “begin,” “beginning,” “began,” “commence,” and “origin” fourteen times in three short pages, and almost all of those words applied directly to the Puritans. That self-understanding, for Perry Miller, started with the Puritans. of such a high order that they not only gave delight to those who appreciated the brilliance of his imaginative and searching intellect, but also contributed to the self-understanding of the whole American Nation.” (1) In order to secure the new-born Republic the American "leader," according to 1 Horace S.Devoting himself to what he called “the meaning of America,” he tried to unravel its mystery and understand “America’s unending struggle to make herself intelligible.” After he died, the theologian Reinhold Niebuhr said that “Miller’s historical labors were. We are just beginning our exploration of whiteness, as a culturally and politically constructed phenomenon.2 This paper presents Thomas Jefferson's moral attitudes from a particular point of view.3 The thesis I defend can be stated in a very schematic way. Scholars of ethnicity in the last thirty years have spent an enormous amount of time analyzing what it has meant to be Indian, or African American, or Mexican American, or Asian American, but scholars of "mainstream" history have spent almost no time analyzing what it means to be "white" whiteness, on the contrary, simply remains the norm by which the difference of the non whites is gauged. Maurizio Valsania Jefferson, perhaps more than any other early democratic theorist, recognized that the development of social institutions and government could not be left to chance or to the "Laws of Nature."1 One of the most fundamental fact about Thomas Jefferson-maybe the fundamental fact about Thomas Jefferson-is that he was a white man, and a landholding white man at that. Journal of the History of Ideas University of Pennsylvania Press Fries, "Varieties of Freedom: An Effort Toward Orchestration," Freedom and Experience: Essays Presented to Horace (1) In order to secure the new-born Republic the American "leader," according to 1 Horace S. Nature in Thomas Jefferson's Moral Experience Nature in Thomas Jefferson's Moral Experience "Our Original Barbarism": Man vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |